On The Book Anna Karenina By Tolstoy: Law, Religion, And Society All Harshly Condemn Anna’s Adultery. But Her Brother, Stiva, Is Also An Adulterer, Cheating On Dolly Not Once But Twice. Stiva’s Case Is Punished Much Less Severely. Why And How Does Tolstoy

Marital infidelity is condemned by law , religion and ordination in almost any country , more so in late 19th century Russia . In our new-fashioned culture as well , the unfaithful woman gets great censure than the man who is guilty of it . This is also the case in Leo Tolstoy s Anna Karenina . Oblonsky (Stiva ) cheats on his wife , not once just twice but he gets no more than a gentle reprimand . Anna Karenina , on the other hand , earns exhausting contempt from auberge for her adulterous liaison with the dashing suppose VronskyOn the surface , Tolstoy himself must have realized the gravity of her law-breaking and to appease the moralists of his day he had to make her pay for it : she commits suicide , crushed beneath an oncoming train . But an in-depth equality of Stiva s and Anna s infidelities , seen in the light of Tolstoyan thought , would suggest the author did not intend to condemn Anna s deed alone , but the blameless society of his day for its hypocrisy , its double standard of moralityDiscussing the diversity of rights in marriage between men and women Pestsov acknowledged that the dissimilarity in marriage .lay in the fact that the infidelity of the wife and the infidelity of the husband are punished unequally , both by the law and by public opinion (4 .12Conservative Russia and notwithstanding contemporary society would tend to look at Stiva with greater understanding and even approval . This emerges after a apprize comparison between him and Anna vis-a-vis their adulterous affairsOblonsky (Stiva ) intended to bound his infidelities a secret Dolly found out well-nigh his affair with the French governess only by his carelessness . In contrast , Anna flirted openly with Vronsky despite knowing Kitty was in love with him and was waiting for his proposal .

While it was not her accuse that Vronsky followed her in the train , letting other people into the develop romance , she could have observed some degree of decorousness or discreetness in his affair with the handsome officeholder , but she did not . The mere fact that Anna and Vronsky remained talking to all(prenominal) other at the little table even in the presence of her husband , at the beginning of their romance , was considered by the circle of guests present indecorous (2 .7 Seemingly unable to cross , like Vronsky , the gravity of their crime , she opted to ignore the judgment of society , including the elite of St . Petersburg where everyone knows everyone else , everyone even visits everyone else as well as of capital of the Russian Federation who frowned on such dalliances in contravention of the established ethical motive of the day (2 .4 Karenin became furious only when , against his insistence that she at least(prenominal) observe propriety and decorum , she allowed her lover to visit her at their home (2 .22Alexey , Anna s husband , is depicted as the suffering troupe . He is pictured as one who is without vices and all faithfulness , although Anna hates him for it . He refuses to be jealous when his wife is besieged with...If you trust to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .