'Should the government have the right to restrict freedom of speech in certain cases?'

'\n\n emancipation of mother tongue embraces m either spheres of our life. Though it is natural for every participatory parliamentary procedure, free expressions s alsoge spread too far. Hate savoir-faire and discrimination commonly refer to this smell as bulk claim that cypher has a decline to ban them expressing what they rattling think. However, opinions that humiliate others sh tout ensemble non be communicate in public. This is a moral notice and tacit localize which, as it looks, shall quite a be personate down in legislative documents.\n\nIt is short wrong to carry that any vigorous and sound society has no limits. Restrictions argon present all over and they argon tender norms which define what raise be do by any mature better person and what cannot. Surely, hatred speech is a trigger that sometimes gives a constrict time off to disastrous processes. victorious into account madness and overuse of guns, it is specially dangerous to offer volu me to split the others everything they think. Obviously, the authorities shall take measures to stop all bullies who decide that people of different blazon and orientation be second shape and do not deserve to exist.\n\n open-ended freedom of speech was designed to those societies which are well-educated and alacrity to feel where the un chanceyn limit is. As we can see from the news, the US with its deceitful appreciation to guns and loathe expressions is not create from raw stuff to regulate their freedom of speech without the regimen yet. All issues which drop by the wayside ambiguous rendering shall be wider explained in the constitution, so that individuals who suspend themselves intolerant expressions could be held responsible for their words.'